Text & Content Analysis

Context: entity (jodie foster)  |  Window: 24h Β· 7d Β· 30d  |  Corpus: 1 articles

This page analyzes how a selected category, entity, or narrative frame appears in recent news coverage within the specified time window. Metrics and breakdowns are derived from the active article corpus.

Corpus KPIs

Entity
jodie foster
Window
Last 30 days
Articles
1
From
2026-04-26 17:26:03+00
To
2026-04-26 17:26:03+00
Range
2026-04-07 00:28:35.402904+00 β†’ 2026-05-07 00:28:35.402904+00
Who’s being talked about

Top Entities

Entity Label Mentions Actions
democrats NORP 2 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
american NORP 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
americans NORP 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
capitol FAC 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
charles iii PERSON 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
charlie kirk PERSON 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
charlottesville GPE 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
davis PERSON 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
donald trump PERSON 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
editorial determining ORG 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
five CARDINAL 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
guardian ORG 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
hilton GPE 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
jimmy carter PERSON 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
jodie foster PERSON 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
john hinckley jr PERSON 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
last year DATE 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
melissa hortman PERSON 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
minnesota GPE 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
mrΒ trump ORG 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
public religion research institute ORG 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
reagan PERSON 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
republicans NORP 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
ronald reagan PERSON 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
Who’s talking

Top Sources (Domains)

Domain Articles % Actions
theguardian.com 1 100.00 πŸ“Š πŸ“° 🧲
How the stories are being framed

Top Narrative Frames

Frame Weight Actions
Civil Unrest, Conflict 0.5300 πŸ“Š 🧲
Business, Companies 0.1700 πŸ“Š 🧲
Government 0.1300 πŸ“Š 🧲
Political Theatre 0.1200 πŸ“Š 🧲
Environment, Climate 0.0400 πŸ“Š 🧲
Technology 0.0200 πŸ“Š 🧲
How it feels

Sentiment

Label Articles Actions
😐 Neutral 1 πŸ“Š 🧲

Articles included

Top entities
Top sources
Top narrative frames
Pub Date Category Domain Title Analyze Author Sent Score
2026-04-26 17:26:03+00 Politics theguardian.com The Guardian view on Trump and the Washington shooting: political violence and gun culture endanger all Analyze Editorial 😐 neutral 0.016